|
|
|
|
Institutional/Organizational Improvement and Public-Private Dialogue Example ProjectsPakistan Districts That Work (DTW) JAA is partnered
with the Urban Institute (UI) in providing Increasing the Effectiveness of the Business Advisory
Council (BAC) in JAA assisted
Albanian stakeholders and the World Bank SEED Program to assess the Albanian
Business Advisory Council (BAC), and to provide an action plan for
improvement. A Government of
Albania ( Prior to the JAA
intervention, the BAC faced numerous challenges. The voice of the business
community was weak and the BAC had several operational problems. BAC meetings
were held without an annual agenda, but on an “emergency” basis, without
sufficient time for preparation and/or consultations with respective experts.
Meetings were not well structured, and often did not adequately adhere to the
agenda. There was very little reporting, and little feedback to members on
subjects discussed, decisions taken and follow-up. De facto, BAC activities
were limited only to advocacy regarding government laws and decisions. BAC
restructuring will ensure and facilitate continuous and increasingly
strategic dialogue between government and business community; will clarify the
mission and key objectives of the BAC; and improve responsibilities and
operational linkages among stakeholders – all to better address Albania’s
needs for economic growth and a sound, enabling business environment. JAA conducted a
detailed assessment of the BAC, discussed its issues with stakeholders and
convened a roundtable to discuss proposals for improvement. JAA then provided
very practical steps to improve both the operations and the strategic focus
of the BAC. These have been incorporated into SEED’s implementation
programming. JAA conducted a
diagnostic survey of the BAC’s efficiency, and then presented its findings to
the JAA interviewed
major stakeholders and reviewed international best practices, in order to
provide the following outputs: definition of the BAC strategy, mission,
objectives and action plan; design of an organizational and functional scheme
and respective guideline of the BAC network (comprised of the BAC itself, the
BMO network (MA and ChoC), government institutions, and Parliament;
determination of types of information and reports to be produced; information
flow (vertical and horizontal); definition of tasks and responsibilities of
BAC members; and on-the-job training for the SME agency staff on techniques
for collecting and processing information, analyzing and interpreting SME
indicators, and recommending to decision makers the policy tools and
instruments to be applied. Restructuring of the JAA provided an
analysis of the Uganda Investment Authority’s (UIA) performance, mission,
strategy, staffing, organization, financial situation and stakeholders and
assisted UIA to finalize its institutional objectives, its strategic plan and
develop a two-year work plan. JAA provided the UIA with assistance in
defining the necessary institutional restructuring requirements, to manage
organizational changes and human resources issues. Under the Uganda
SPEED Project, JAA assisted the Government of Uganda (GoU) to plan the merger
of the Uganda Export Promotion Board, Uganda Investment Authority and Uganda
Tourist Board. The work was carried out as part of the Medium Term
Competitiveness Strategy (MTCS). A merger of the
UIA, UEPB and UTB had long been discussed. President Museveni, in September
2001, mandated the merger, conceived to improve results and achieve operating
efficiencies related to the promotion of investment, exports and tourism..
The Ministry of Finance and Economic Planning (MoFPED) requested JAA to
provide assistance to design the organization and work plan for the new
entity, and the steps to be taken to implement the change. A team of three
consultants undertook this challenging assignment. Because of the
sensitivity of the merger, the need to minimize disruptions and
uncertainties, and the need to effectuate a smooth transition, a very
transparent and step-wise process was conceived and implemented. SPEED was
not asked to comment on or reconsider the President’s decision, but only to
provide the optimum blueprint for implementation. The process was a
valuable and innovative one, which has informed subsequent sectoral,
investment and competitiveness thinking and implementation and subsequent
government budget allocations. In the course of the assignment, the team
prepared several technical notes, which continue to provide national guidance
on matters concerning business-led economic growth. Assistance to the
Centre d’Appui aux Pétites et Moyennes Entreprises au Rwanda (CAPMER) The Centre d’Appui
aux Pétites et Moyennes Entreprises au JAA provided
assistance to UNIDO in conducting this study. JAA assisted in obtaining
agreement with the World Bank as to the requirements for effectiveness of the
CAPMER component of the project; and helped CAPMER to prepare the needed
inputs for the component effectiveness, to define its Business Plan and to
identify its requirements under the World Bank Project component. JAA also
provided recommendations on next steps in CAPMER finalizing and implementing
their business plan under the World Bank Competitiveness and Enterprise
Development Project Food Security Study CARE's use of food
aid has significantly influenced how CARE carries out programs and how it is
structured. In addition, programming food aid has given CARE its visibility
with host governments and communities, and has contributed enormously to the
growth of the organization. Given the array of issues around food aid and how
to use it, CARE undertook a comprehensive Policy Review on the use of food
resources in its programs. This Review led to recommendations for an
organization-wide, updated policy. As part of this
process, CARE developed five major policy papers. JAA was engaged by CARE to
prepare three of the five the assessments: external trends and policies,
stakeholder analyses, and food and its impact on CARE as an organization. These analyses
considered broad issues such as the use of food aid for emergency, general
relief and safety net programs with direct distribution as the mechanism of
choice; the appropriate degree of emphasis on monetization, as converting
food aid into a cash resource provides greater program flexibility to address
food insecurity in the long term; the socio-economic and political
environments in which CARE operates; and effects of trade liberalization,
economies in transition, new political leadership and philosophy in
developing countries and declining donor foreign aid budgets. JAA examined the
impact of food resources on the CARE organization. The JAA team reviewed
impacts on the organization’s financial and administrative and management
(logistics, inventory and monitoring systems, internal audit, legal considerations,
human resources, donor relations) choices. JAA also analyzed
major social, political and economic changes, trends and directions at global
and regional levels and identified those that may have major effects on
addressing food security. JAA examined the interests of different
stakeholders who provided or received food resources, i.e. regions or
countries experiencing long-term, chronic food deficits, short term cyclical
deficits and those regions and countries normally food self-sufficient or
would be net exporters of food. In the context of the identified changes,
trends and directions, JAA examined the role, threats and opportunities for
the use of food resources for alleviation of poverty. JAA studied the role of
food as a resource in short-term natural disasters and complex political
emergencies providing information on successes, lessons, threats and
opportunities encountered in these situations. JAA provided
recommendations related to trends in globalization (including implications
from technology and information, transnational business trends, international
capital flows and trade trends, etc.); global ecology (including Implications
from climate change, and trends pertaining to soil degradation,
deforestation, from biodiversity and energy); food and agriculture (including
Implications from food production, consumption and trade trends, and
biotechnology issues); governance; and poverty. Organizational and Technical Assistance to JAA worked with
Opportunity International on the development of appropriate organizational
mechanisms, guidelines, incentives and approaches for improving the
effectiveness of their sixty implementing partners and seven support partners
worldwide. JAA provided effective solutions to the Board and the
Director's concerns regarding improving results, organizational
effectiveness, and technical assistance. JAA presented Opportunity
International with best practices in corporate and social enterprise
organization and management, and helped Opportunity International to create a
strategy and action plan for organizational change. JAA was also
responsible for facilitating the internal dialogue and decision-making
process, which contributed to consensus and effective implementation of the
strategy and action plan.
For information on more projects related to Institutional/Organizational Improvement and Public-Private Dialogue, please view our JAA Corporate Capabilities and Qualifications Document
|
|
|
|
|
|
|